Jump to content

Talk:Phases and Stages/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 15:20, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Does she really "deserted" him or just "left" him? But overall the prose is pretty good; MOS too.
corrected (deserted--->left).--GDuwenTell me! 17:57, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Please use {{sfn}} template; Replace AllRovi with Rovi Corporation
Done.--GDuwenTell me! 17:57, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  3. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  5. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
  • ISBN check: ok
  • Dabsolver check: ok
  • Checklinks check: ok
  • Reflinks check: -
  • The references are the only issue.
  • Promoting good work!--♫GoP♫TCN 11:05, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]