Jump to content

Talk:Phylo (video game)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved Kotniski (talk) 11:58, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Phylo (video game)Phylo — Phylo (video game) should be the primary topic for disambiguation. Google web search for Phylo brings up the game's page much earlier than Phylo (mythology). Phylo (mythology) has only a wrong link to Phylo (video game) under 'What links here'. Though a game, Phylo (video game) has a strong academic basis which should be taken into account. Ecruos (talk) 03:02, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would normally agree with WP:RECENTISM, but the target mythology article is an orphaned, single-sentence stub with no links to it nor any references. WP:PRIMARYTOPIC suggests using 'What links here' to determine primary topic, which Phylo (game) has far more of, as well as search engine results, with the only result coming back from "Phylo Homer" or related searches being a single line in The Odyssey with no further substance. This is in contrast to "Phylo game", which yields multiple results from well-known news sources and comparisons to Foldit and Rosetta@Home, two already established articles in computational biology. - Ecruos (talk) 03:54, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please see WP:TWODABS, a disambiguation page for a term that has only one other secondary topic is unnecessary and should use disambiguation links. - Ecruos (talk) 05:27, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Just saw your edit to Phylo, actually, yeah, a disambiguation page might be better. - Ecruos (talk) 16:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The images used in the article should be updated.[edit]

--They had a redesign. Dillonoliviero (talk) 22:51, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]