Talk:Physics Wallah/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Pass - MSincccc (talk) 12:06, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Sohom Datta (talk · contribs) 18:20, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sohom Datta As the nominator, I trust you'll consider my comments. The article has the potential to be passed as GA, but I require your cooperation. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 03:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MSinccccLet me know if the changes work? Sohom (talk) 03:24, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By November 2023, Physics Wallah had expanded to 67 offline centers in 34 cities across India.[13] However, in the same month, the company laid off 150 employees, amounting to 0.8% of its workforce, citing performance reasons.

Reviewer: MSincccc (talk · contribs) 08:11, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):

I would suggest merging paragraphs 2 and 3 of the "History" section.

Done

A 7-episode web series named Physics Wallah on the life of Alakh Pandey and his company was released on 15 December 2022 on Amazon Mini TV. Alakh Pandey, the series' protagonist, was portrayed by Shreedhar Dubey. This could be rephrased into a single sentence rather than two.

Done
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

On 21 March 2023, several teachers at the ed-tech company alleged that the vision of the company was being disillusioned and in response started an independent YouTube channel by the name, 'Sankalp Bharat'. This sentence needs to comply with WP:Proseline.

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):

Could you please change all the dates mentioned in the cited references to the dmy format for consistency?

Done Sohom (talk) 14:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):

EARWIG score is alarmingly high at 64.6% at the time of writing.

Nothing to do here, the site appears to be plagarising off Wikipedia. Sohom (talk) 13:08, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):
b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Spotcheck[edit]

1-Y Please move it to the article body as per MOS:LEAD

Fixed Sohom (talk) 13:08, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sohom Datta As per MOS:LEAD, citations should preferably be avoided in the lead section. Please remove reference no. 1, which is still present in the article lead. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 13:20, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like I accidentally discarded the edit. Sohom (talk) 14:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

3-Y
8-Y
11-Y
14-Y
18-Y
22-Y

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.