Talk:Pictogram

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Gkleiman.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

kind and usses of thise[edit]

This page does not really apply to the "as distinguished from petroglyphs" meaning, so either that should be at the top of the page, or there should be a separate "pictograph" page for the "rock painting" definition, since the definition on the main page includes both forms of rock art.Mk421 (talk) 04:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Public toilets[edit]

Is the "Pictogram for public toilets" used internationally? Hyacinth 08:22, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

yes.

Is the "pictogram for public toilets" actually a pictogram? Whilst the signs represents a man / woman - they aren't used to actually mean "man" / "woman", but rather male-toilet / female-toilet - which makes them ideograms rather than pictograms --Davémon 11:39, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And I think 'yes' should probably be qualified. Uncited, I may go as far as "it's generally accepted as an 'internationally recognized' symbol", but I can think of a few places in the world where the representation of a woman in a short dress would be bordering on pornographic to local norms. Thoughts/Examples? Fracture98 15:45, 29 August 2006 (UTC)it is a great tupe of gram[reply]

Traffic signs as pictograms[edit]

In countries or regions where two or more languages are used, the typical traffic sign is very often a symbol with no writing on it. This is the case for much of Europe and several parts of Canada. Many of these signs, however, offer an abstract symbol instead of a picture, and they cannot be considered true pictograms.

ideogram v. pictogram[edit]

Please see my recent post at Talk:Chinese_character_classification#Ideogram_vs._Pictogram.

Self-Promotion[edit]

I'm about to delete the section promoting the Book of the Ground wiki, for obvious reasons. Not that it isn't interesting. Tdimhcs (talk) 00:46, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Historical[edit]

The historical facts are referenced without citation. The first paragraph presents several specific ideas and is completely without citations.

Modern Uses[edit]

There should be a link or citation to the London map referenced Gkleiman (talk) 14:56, 12 September 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gkleiman (talkcontribs) 03:02, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:20, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relation to emojis and hieroglyphs[edit]

It would be good if the article stated the relation to emojis and hieroglyphs. Bjornte (talk) 10:38, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The medical nurse did not inform the FM team of the incident.[edit]

The medical nurse did not inform the FM team of the incident. 15.248.4.127 (talk) 04:40, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]