Talk:Pictogram
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Gkleiman.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
kind and usses of thise
[edit]- rock painting as distinguished from petroglyphs;
- a chart which represents numeric data by pictures.
This page does not really apply to the "as distinguished from petroglyphs" meaning, so either that should be at the top of the page, or there should be a separate "pictograph" page for the "rock painting" definition, since the definition on the main page includes both forms of rock art.Mk421 (talk) 04:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Public toilets
[edit]Is the "Pictogram for public toilets" used internationally? Hyacinth 08:22, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
yes.
Is the "pictogram for public toilets" actually a pictogram? Whilst the signs represents a man / woman - they aren't used to actually mean "man" / "woman", but rather male-toilet / female-toilet - which makes them ideograms rather than pictograms --Davémon 11:39, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
And I think 'yes' should probably be qualified. Uncited, I may go as far as "it's generally accepted as an 'internationally recognized' symbol", but I can think of a few places in the world where the representation of a woman in a short dress would be bordering on pornographic to local norms. Thoughts/Examples? Fracture98 15:45, 29 August 2006 (UTC)it is a great tupe of gram
Traffic signs as pictograms
[edit]In countries or regions where two or more languages are used, the typical traffic sign is very often a symbol with no writing on it. This is the case for much of Europe and several parts of Canada. Many of these signs, however, offer an abstract symbol instead of a picture, and they cannot be considered true pictograms.
ideogram v. pictogram
[edit]Please see my recent post at Talk:Chinese_character_classification#Ideogram_vs._Pictogram.
Self-Promotion
[edit]I'm about to delete the section promoting the Book of the Ground wiki, for obvious reasons. Not that it isn't interesting. Tdimhcs (talk) 00:46, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Historical
[edit]The historical facts are referenced without citation. The first paragraph presents several specific ideas and is completely without citations.
Modern Uses
[edit]There should be a link or citation to the London map referenced Gkleiman (talk) 14:56, 12 September 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gkleiman (talk • contribs) 03:02, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:20, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Relation to emojis and hieroglyphs
[edit]It would be good if the article stated the relation to emojis and hieroglyphs. Bjornte (talk) 10:38, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
The medical nurse did not inform the FM team of the incident.
[edit]The medical nurse did not inform the FM team of the incident. 15.248.4.127 (talk) 04:40, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- Start-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- Start-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- Start-Class Systems articles
- High-importance Systems articles
- Systems articles in visualization
- WikiProject Systems articles
- Start-Class Indigenous peoples of the Americas articles
- High-importance Indigenous peoples of the Americas articles
- Indigenous peoples of the Americas articles
- Start-Class Writing system articles
- Top-importance Writing system articles