Talk:Piedmont Airlines Flight 22

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Accidents

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the Aviation accident project.

Criticism of NTSB report

I changed the tone of the conflict of interest to more NPOV. I also added {{Fact}} to 2 statements that I cannot substantiate by reading the report:

The current article says that the C-310 reported its heading to ATC, whereas all I could find is the vague 'Asheville' in the readback, which could be interpreted in many ways, but no heading ('heading' in aviation is in degrees, like '340').
The article says that there is no 4 seconds pause in the transcript - I am not sure what is meant by that. I certainly understood from the report that there was such a pause, which was very important to explain the apparent confusion on the part of the C-310 pilot.

Any comments on the above would be welcome. Thanks, Crum375 13:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added "alleged" and removed the ‹The template Talkfact is being considered for merging.› ^{[citation needed]}. These were his allegations as noted in the references, so they're cited. This doesn't say anything as to the truth of the allegations, only that he made them. Alanhwiki 22:49, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

N68650.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:37, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]