This article was nominated for deletion on 11 March 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
I seem to be missing something fundamental about Google Scholar. Why does a work by Maynard, Peters and Li, with no Vossen in the author list, show up at rank 8 for Vossen? If this is supposed to be an article citing Vossen: it's not, check the bibliography. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 20:20, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Very astutely seen! I have no time right now, I'll look into it tomorrow, but this is indeed weird. I have seen this in GS searches, but not in profiles (where scholars are supposed to have weeded out false positives). --Randykitty (talk) 20:35, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I first saw this at position 40, but there are several more papers that don't have Vossen's name in them anywhere. I'm not sure if GScholar is a reliable source here, or anywhere for that matter (I just checked a few other random scientists and I see the same phenomenon, though less extreme). QVVERTYVS (hm?) 23:08, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Very weird. It already starts with the third article in his profile not being his... I have seen this in search results (i.e., when you enter a person's name in GS), but never in profiles, which are only created by an action of the person in question (and verified by an institutional email). Given this, I have removed the whole section on publications and citations until I have time to search for him in Web of Science (but as "Vossen" is a not uncommon Dutch name, that may be a bit more difficult). --Randykitty (talk) 12:40, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
