Jump to content

Talk:Pilotwings 64/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Airplaneman talk 20:08, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist & comments

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    I will copyedit myself unless I am not sure, in which case I will list the problems below for you to address:
    Under the "Gameplay" section, the lead sentence, Pilotwings 64 is a 3D flight simulator in which the player must complete a variety of missions using different airborne vehicles and aerial sports. I think it is meant to say something along the lines of Pilotwings 64 is a 3D flight simulator in which the player must complete a variety of missions using different airborne vehicles in many aerial sports events. or something. Please clarify. Airplaneman talk 20:35, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
     Done — will pass. Airplaneman talk 03:32, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Checklinks fine. Sources look good. Airplaneman talk 20:35, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: