Talk:Pinus brutia

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lebanon Mid‑importance

	Lebanon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lebanon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lebanon-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LebanonWikipedia:WikiProject LebanonTemplate:WikiProject LebanonLebanon articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Edit to improve sort order in Category Pinus

I edited this to change the sort order on the page for the Category:Pinus. It had been set to alphabetize under Pine. That might make sense for categories where there are a lot of trees and a few of them are pines; then all the pines group together. But on the page where everything is a pine, it made more sense to alphabetize under Turkish. 71.126.140.136 (talk) 11:39, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Stephen Kosciesza[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Big-cone pinyon which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:46, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relies on one source too much?

I recently made some changes to help clean up the article and while there's still some more I plan on doing, I want to know if this is relying on one source too much. Frankis 1999 is the most recent description of the species I could find, and its what makes up a good deal of the backbone of the conifers.org and other sources; the other sources they cite didn't seem to be comprehensive descriptions of the species. Zucchinibyday (talk) 13:00, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]