Talk:Pioneer Football League

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Logos[edit]

There is a discussion to clarify our policy/guideline on the use of sports team logos. Please see Wikipedia_talk:Logos#Clarification_on_use_of_sports_team_logos if you wish to participate in the discussion. Johntex\^talk 16:42, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit[edit]

I am going to take out the part that states that Cleveland State had beaten Ohio State in 1938 (however relevant that is anyway) because a.) Irrelevance and b.) http://cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/div_ia/bigten/ohio_state/yearly_results.php?year=1935 because neither had matched up in 1938. TPershiganv50 (talk) 14:25, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to make timelines more consistent[edit]

I noticed that conferences in List of NCAA conferences have articles, usually including a membership timeline. While some of the decisions made for each conference make some sense, there is a wide variety of styles for the various timelines, particularly involving color choices, but also other matters of style that could be more consistent.

for example, a school with a yellow bar means:

An associate member in one sport (if part of the BE)
A former member of the conference (in the SEC)
A future member of the conference (in the SEC and Big West)
A football only member (in the Sun Belt)
A team that has moved to another conference (in the WAC, NEC)
A full member of the Big Sky

Some graphs have captions, some do not, and none are centered. To see the variety of styles, review Current conference timelines

I think it would be worth discussing how best to provide some measure of consistency, recognizing that there may be legitimate reasons for some differences from a standard presentation (for example, some conferences show the name of the new conference for former members. In some cases, this makes sense, in other, it may not.)

I've produced a draft of how the timelines would look with some consistency added. Please see Draft proposal of conference timelines.

I propose a discussion to see if there is consensus on improving the consistency.

Because it would not be practical to have this discussion on each and every conference talk page, I suggest centralizing this discussion at the Talk page of Project College football SPhilbrick (Talk) 02:22, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about overview maps for US collegiate athletic conferences[edit]

A discussion on the Project College Football talk page has been created to discuss the proper format of the overview maps that are used for the US collegiate athletic conference pages.

If you're interested, please join the discussion here: Athletic conference overview maps and their lack of consistency. Mdak06 (talk) 23:54, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mercer membership[edit]

In that Mercer departed before ever becoming a participant, they are neither a truly "Full Member" nor a "Departing Member." Thus, should they even be included in the members listing and timeline? I would think that merely the mention in the "Membership Changes" section would suffice. GWFrog (talk) 14:41, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Pioneer Football League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:06, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Map Needs Update[edit]

With the addition of St. Thomas (MN), the current map of conference member locations is inaccurate on that it does not have Minnesota highlighted. 2601:447:C180:3950:BC98:7561:1B31:397D (talk) 19:23, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]