Talk:Piper PA-48 Enforcer

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Piper PA-48 Enforcer article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Rating[edit]

Might nudge 'mid' importance as it is part of the P-51 family? - Aerobird 04:35, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Text in section "Design & development" seems mixed up[edit]

Hi Wikipedians, just noticed that the text in the Design and development section of this article seems to jump from the 70's to the 80's and back to the 70's; hence is a bit confusing. Without access to the sources used to write this section, I'm not comfortable in trying to fix this without affecting the quality of the information in this section.
Can any of the original editors please amend this? Or if someone can point me to the source that explains the plane's development, I'll be happy to fix it.
Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 01:17, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hardpoins[edit]

"Hardpoints: Six underwing hardpoints with a maximum capacity of 5,680 lb (2,576 kg)."

The photos strongly suggest a total of 10 hardpoints / pylons for external stores in addition to (possibly jettisonable) wingtip tanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.0.105.113 (talk) 22:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]