Talk:Plain-backed sparrow

Birds Low‑importance

Plain-backed sparrow is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Country list[edit]

@Loopy30: Country lists aren't exactly banned, and 'South-east Asia' (which should be 'southeast Asia' I think) isn't adequate to describe the distribution of this species although I agree it's better for the first sentence. I can add some more but don't fix what isn't broken? —innotata 02:07, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Country lists may not be banned, but linking to major geographical features (such as country names) should always be avoided where the target article has no additional information or depth on the article linked from. If the range is made up of disparate locations, a list can be used. Defined regions (North America, western Europe, SE Asia etc) are much easier for the reader to form a mental image of than piecing together elements of a country list. Biogeographic regions would be preferred over political units (country names) but best of all would be a range map. This map should also show the true range, and not just the entire country when only a portion is intended. Loopy30 (talk) 02:20, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, making a map takes work. Especially to do it well and accurately. I'll just give a brief description for now, ah well. —innotata 03:08, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]