Talk:Podophyllin
Appearance
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from [[]] was copied or moved into [[]]. The former page's [ history] now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Merger proposal
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was to **complete** the merge Tentrillion (talk) 13:57, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
I propose that Podophyllin be merged into Podophyllotoxin. I think that the content in the Podophyllin article can easily be explained in the context of Podophyllotoxin, and the Podophyllotoxin article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Podophyllin will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. The original source of the Podophyllin article was the 1911 edition of Encycopedia Britannica. The primarily useful compound from podphyllin has been characterized and isolated since then, and it is Podophyllotoxin. Tentrillion (talk) 02:19, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.