Talk:Point of Inquiry
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
POI staff exit
[edit]according to the press release... https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SEaa9gaIpeqpf1SA7G0UfoYwyL-B82oTppr7lbj6rx4/edit .. POI is not moving. Their producer and 2 hosts are... And please find a source other than a blog post. Thank you. Cap020570 (talk) 00:18, 26 June 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cap020570 (talk • contribs) 00:12, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
- My current edits correct this problem. Blog posts that reported the news and the press release issued via Google Docs are the only sources that have reported on this development. I realize this may post a problem for WP:SOURCE, but I'd argue that blogs should be allowed for citation purposes in circumstances where there is really no way to gain "expertise" on the topic that is being reported - especially when the topic involves developments about volunteer organizations and controversies that develop within them. Briancrisan (talk) 00:54, 8 July 2013 (UTC)