Talk:Politics of Vietnam/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Oakley77 (talk · contribs) 01:59, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality: (Quality is very good.)
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: (Everything is perfect in this section.)
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources: (All the sources come from 3 different websites but still provide reliable info.)
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: (Every paragraph has at least one source/reference.)
    C. No original research: (No original research found.)
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects: (Covers all the details prior, during, and after the matches.)
    B. Focused: (Always stays on topic about the PPV.)
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias: (No bias found.)
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc: (Took a look at the article history and everything seems to be fine.)
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: (All the images are properly sourced and copyrighted. Non-free images have fair use rationales.)
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: (Captions and pictures are good)
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Very good article and I am also very impressed...PASS!!!--Oakley77 (talk) 02:13, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember that contributions to this review are greatly encouraged!Oakley77 (talk) 02:13, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]