Jump to content

Talk:Pond Eddy Bridge/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Oh my! You Americans are so alike—you always forget to establish context through naming the country ;) Otherwise, nothing a tiny copyedit could not fix. Just note the difference between a hyphen (-) and an endash (–). The latter is used for ranges (when something is in between two other things), eg. $7–8 million, Pennsylvania–New Jersy boarder.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    No problems. Congratulations with yet another good article. Arsenikk (talk) 23:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]