Jump to content

Talk:Port Talbot Railway 0-8-2T (Sharp Stewart)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rename article?

[edit]

As the Barry Railway Class H was also a Sharp Stewart 0-8-2T, I suggest this article be re-named. I suggest Port Talbot Railway 0-8-2T (Sharp Stewart). At the same time, I suggest that Cooke 0-8-2T be re-named Port Talbot Railway 0-8-2T (Cooke). Biscuittin (talk) 17:05, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it --Redrose64 (talk) 20:12, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All done. Should we now add these locos to Template:GWR Locomotives? Biscuittin (talk) 10:44, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That template is too darn crowded as it is. I'd like it confined to true GWR locos; we can have a separate template for the locomotive-owning companies amalgamated with (AD, Barry, Cambrian, Cardiff, Rhymney, TV) or absorbed by (BM, BPGV, CMDP, GV, LMM, MSWJ, N&B, PT, P&M, RSB, SHT, SWM) the GWR in 1922-24. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:44, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, sounds like a good idea. Biscuittin (talk) 17:54, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a navbox, {{GWR absorbed locos 1922 on}}, so far it's only on this article. The Barry, Rhymney and Taff Vale rows are pinched straight from {{GWR Locomotives}}; the other rows are from what I could find under Category:Great Western Railway locomotives. All the group names are there; several don't show because the related |listn= is blank. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:19, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That's a good start. Biscuittin (talk) 13:55, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have started adding your navbox to the articles. Biscuittin (talk) 20:15, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Completed. Biscuittin (talk) 20:19, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have created a page GWR absorbed locos 1922 on for locos which do not yet have individual pages. Biscuittin (talk) 21:08, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]