Talk:Porticus Octaviae

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Shouldn't Porticus Octaviae and Porticus Octavia have separate pages (Porticus Octavia redirects to Porticus Octaviae), since both this article and Lacus Curtis make the point that the Porticus Octaviae and the Porticus Octavia are separate but often confused structures? Electron100 02:13, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done Neddyseagoon - talk 09:58, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yes it should but they should down in the links side.--60cent 06:22, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Imprecision in lede[edit]

In the lede it's said that the Sant'Angelo in Pescheria church was built circa 770 AD. Michael Ott wrote in The Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Volume 14/St. Symphorosa (see Works related to Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/St. Symphorosa at Wikisource) that Pope Stephen (II) III transferred the remains of St. Symphorosa to that church in 752. So the church must have been built at least in the first half of the VIII century CE. Carlotm (talk) 20:37, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]