Talk:Post-Britpop/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:49, 3 April 2010 (UTC) I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- All online sources are live links
- The article is adequately referenced.
- Sources all appear to be reliable
- All sources support the cited statements
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- As broad as is possible for such a young genre.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It appears fair and un-biassed
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Stable, no edit warring
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- One image used, with correct licensing and a caption. Might be nice to see more pictures, but not a GA requirement
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- A good short article, and it meets all the GA criteria, so I am happy to list this. When we move onto the next genre, it may be possible to add a more retrospective look at the subject but for the moment it is fine. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 23:19, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: