Talk:Próspera
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
[Untitled][edit]
"The construction and possible expansion of the city is also feared to lead to the expropriation of the local population and human rights violations.[7]"
While the referent of the fear is not a fringe view in Honduras, it is probably false and unsupported by any evidence that I have seen. Sort of like many conspiracy theories in the US which Wikipedia tries not to uncritically repeat. I can probably find plenty of RS but I don't have time right now.2600:1011:B00A:8CB9:B56C:C350:BE72:EC61 (talk) 06:48, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Peacock tag[edit]
Would help to scope this more narrowly. I assume the first paragraph of the Overview section that is the issue? Or are there other parts that prompted the adding of the tag? ChristopheBiocca (talk) 14:12, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- The entire overview section is speculative and promotional. We need content based on independent sources, not marketing-speak. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:04, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
The part about TUM is blatantly untrue: https://web.tresorit.com/l/hg8rb#XMQTxRZCvZ4z6NENPYQ0nw — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.192.108.100 (talk) 02:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC)