Talk:Prežihov Voranc

Prežihov Voranc was nominated as a Language and literature good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (October 18, 2020). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Slovenia Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Slovenia to-do list:

Here are some tasks you can do (watch):

Requests: Jože Tisnikar (sl), Protestant Reformation in the Slovene Lands (sl), Metlika black (sl)
Wikify: Russia–Slovenia relations
Unreferenced: Inner Carniola, Litostroj, Pavel Golia, Predjama Castle
Cleanup: Edvard Ravnikar, Škofja Loka, Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 1308
Expand: Education in Slovenia
Stubs: Ajdovi žganci, Čop Street, Omar Naber, Radenska
NPOV: Gregorij Rožman, Siddharta (band)
Portal maintenance: Update News, Did you know, announcements, and suggest Selected article and picture
Help assess the quality of 63 unassessed articles
Take/Add requested photographs

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Prežihov Voranc/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: No Great Shaker (talk · contribs) 05:59, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Starting review. Hope to have some feedback soon. No Great Shaker (talk) 05:59, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GAFAIL[edit]

Sorry, but I cannot commence the review because of the refimprove banner that was placed on 9 October, which is now more than seven days ago. No action has been taken to address the issue and the lack of sources is a major consideration in any GA review. Under the terms of WP:GAFAIL, in that one of the six key criteria is unfulfilled, I am failing the review. I had hoped when I picked up the review five days ago that it would trigger a response to the sourcing notice. No Great Shaker (talk) 08:02, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]