Talk:Precious Brady-Davis/Archive 1

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 09:54, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Precious Brady-Davis and her husband were the first transgender couple to have their gender identities listed correctly on an Illinois birth certificate? Source: https://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/ct-life-first-transgender-birth-certificate-tt-01132020-20200114-qfbbf3dvufhppid5shjru6l5xu-story.html
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Rodger Page

Created by Paul2520 (talk). Self-nominated at 03:55, 27 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Precious Brady-Davis; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Article is newly created, it's long enough. It's neutrally written and verified, especially with the Chicago Tribune source that covers the hook. Earwig is copacetic. QPQ is provided. Too bad Pride Month is almost over. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:42, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Subjective Content

This is a very bizarrely-written article. So much of it is subjective, irrelevant, or just outright unprovable.

She is the most visible trans woman of color climate activist.

How is this objective?

Many LGBTQ+ teens look up to her for her inspirational story of resilience.

How is this relavent?

Why was citation 1 cited 16 times, and citation 3 cited 18?

This entire thing seems like a poorly-written biography masquerading as a genuine article. 73.166.217.35 (talk) 21:26, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

The two sentences you flagged are changed.

Those citations you mention back up many of the statements in the article. I'm not aware of any guidelines around how many times a given reference should be cited.

Would you be interested in creating an account? See Wikipedia:Be bold for some guidelines that have influenced me. = paul2520 💬 14:51, 15 July 2023 (UTC)