Jump to content

Talk:Prehistoric North Africa/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Writing system

Distinguished primarily by cultural and linguistic attributes, the Berbers lacked a written language and hence tended to be overlooked or marginalized in historical accounts.

What about Tifinagh? -- Error 02:01, 15 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Move request

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:28, 9 March 2010 (UTC)


I propose to rename this article to Prehistoric North Africa (currently redirecting to History of North Africa). The article in fact is a stub that concerns the history of thye whole Saharan region. All the archaeological cultures mentioned in the text extend far beyond Algeria. If the article is renamed, I am going to extend it by adding some text and references to literature and sites. --Dmitri Lytov (talk) 20:19, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Mouserian/Aterian dates

The article states:

Later, Neandertal tool makers produced hand axes in the Levalloisian and Mousterian styles (c. 43,000 BCE) similar to those in the Levant. According to some sources,[who?] North Africa was the site of the highest state of development of Middle Paleolithic flake-tool techniques. Tools of this era, starting about 30,000 BCE, are called Aterian (after the site Bir el Ater, south of Annaba) and are marked by a high standard of workmanship, great variety, and specialization.

I thought Aterian was much older than that. Aterian stone tools have been discovered recently and dated +175.000 BP, and in any case it has been in the region since 90.000 BP. http://friendfeed.com/sarnet001/10db26a8/aterian-artifacts-at-175-000-bp-ifri-nammar

About Mousterian, I thought also it disappeared about 70-80.000 years BP, althought there's no consensus on this. If the article states there are mousterian hand axes dated only 43.000 BP, it'd nice to read the source, because it's way recent than the current accepted dates, at least for western Africa. With "Neandertal tool makers" do you mean neanderthals were living in North Africa only by 43.000 BP? That's pretty recent.

I hope you'll give some more information on this interesting article, and if dates are wrong they must be corrected.

Cheers,

Maria Lluïsa —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.6.190.117 (talk) 01:39, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Why is there no info on the first arrival of homo sapiens in north africa?

I posted a reliable source for this and made some changes and now its gone. Is it completely pointless to try to contribute to wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prophetofreason (talkcontribs) 01:02, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Never mind I see it now. I feel kind of stupid.Prophetofreason (talk) 01:06, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Prehistoric North Africa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:13, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Prehistoric North Africa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:15, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Archive 1