Talk:Preston Leslie/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. I have done a bit of copy editing. Hope this is O.K. Mostly, I combined paragraphs to reduce choppiness and other small edits that did not alter the meaning of the text. The article looks good. I have one small question before I pass the article. What is the "Ill" in the reference: McQueen, Keven (2001). Offbeat Kentuckians: Legends to Lunatics. Ill? If it refers to the location of the publisher, it should follow the publisher. —Mattisse (Talk) 16:39, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

It's an abbreviation for "illustrated". Acdixon ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 15:28, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

OK. I wonder if that is standard. I have no idea. Anyway, it doesn't upset GA. —Mattisse (Talk) 15:49, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): Clearly written b (MoS): Follows relevant MoS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): References are reliable c (OR): No OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): Covers major areas b (focused): Keeps the focus on the topic

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias: Neutral

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.: Stable

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: Pass

Congratulations!

—Mattisse (Talk) 15:54, 15 June 2009 (UTC)