Talk:Priceline (Australia)

Clean-up

Main problems:

1. Promotional undertone
2. Dubious sections such as "change of logo and refresh", and "products". Do we really need an entire section devoted to detailing every product on sale?

-Reconsider! 05:41, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

agreed. this article is too much like an advertising brochure for this company. Will return. Amaher (talk) 23:29, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

OK done major clean up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amaher (talk • contribs) 00:02, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

removal of self published promotional material

I removed the following text today: Given the uncertainty in consumer confidence created by the global financial crisis, the brand was well placed at the value end of the retail market as consumers became more value conscious. It clearly says in WP:SELFPUB that self published sources may be used so long as

  1. the material is not unduly self-serving;
  2. it does not involve claims about third parties;

so yes it's ok to state the rate of growth of the company and cite the parent company's annual report - but it's not really appropriate to use this source to make claims about what consumers (third parties) became aware of. You would need a more detailed study in a more reliable source for that. Cheers, --Amaher (talk) 10:38, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Affiliations

I am editing the article on behalf of Priceline in order to contribute to a neutral and reliably sourced article that is consistently up to date. I intend to edit responsibly and follow Wikipedia policies and guidelines. As such, I have disclosed existing affiliations on this talk page as advised in WP:CONFLICT. In disclosing my interests I would like to request others' views, particularly if my edits may be contested. Smallworldsocial (talk) 05:43, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

http:/en.m.Wikipedia.org

Www.paypal.en.m.Wikipedia.org 50.86.52.54 (talk) 13:04, 21 January 2023 (UTC)