Talk:Proclamation For the Encouragement of Piety and Virtue

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 July 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep (with rename).

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Pornography Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wehwalt is right: The BBC source is inaccurate.[edit]

User:Wehwalt, Thank you for the much-needed corrections. I think your edits are correct, and my old material was incorrect. I had lifted it from this BBC article, which I believe contains inaccuracies itself.

As a result, be aware that your corrections actually contradict the BBC source in the footnotes. The solution may simply be to delete the BBC source as a citation. Andrew Gradman ^talk/_WP:Hornbook 21:52, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I read the AfD, I'm sorry, I had totally forgotten this aritcle until I came across the see also. Uh, I would say keep BBC as a reference but don't use it to cite what is obviously wrong. There must be a backstory to this, I will see if I can find out anything. Why else would monarchs over the course of over a century issue near identical proclamations? I appreciate very much your staying involved with the article.--Wehwalt (talk) 03:15, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Source for yawning quote[edit]

Is here: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=xss9AQAAMAAJ&lpg=RA1-PA235 p 235 It should be given in context, and pointed out that while the author notes the practice, he says it is rare and he deplores it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.171.222.250 (talk) 14:08, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]