Jump to content

Talk:Professor Layton and the New World of Steam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Valereee talk 12:24, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Suntooooth (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 6 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 05:43, 5 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Just realised that the hook I proposed probably falls foul of WP:DYKFICTION. An alternative:
ALT1 won't work either, because hooks must not be likely to change, and 'will' will date.--Launchballer 23:18, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer: The game isn't releasing until 2025 and no main entries are planned to release before it, so I don't see how this is an issue - if this hook is promoted, it'll definitely be before 2025. I've seen other hooks use "will" for something that'll be happening in the future, but not within the time it takes for the DYK process to complete. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 23:24, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Full review needed.--Launchballer 16:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1 would seem to run afoul of WP:CRYSTAL, particularly number 5, but if it doesn't, then "will" in the hook needs to be replaced with something less definite, like "is planned to" or "is set to", since there's no guarantee that the game doesn't undergo changes in emphasis or doesn't get canceled altogether. I'm sorry to hear that other hooks have used "will", because they generally shouldn't do so. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@BlueMoonset: I've changed it to "is planned to be"; I don't fully understand how WP:CRYSTAL applies to a non-article like a DYK hook, but I get where you're coming from regardless. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 09:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Suntooooth The article is long enough, new enough, and neutral with all reliable sources. The QPQ is complete, and the hook is directly cited. However, it seems like "planned" needs to be in the article to match the hook. SL93 (talk) 18:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Valereee (talk) 12:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]