Jump to content

Talk:Promethium/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AstroHurricane001 (talk · contribs) 00:12, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

The article is of decent quality and adequately summarizes known relevant facts - recommend clearing up the remaining "citation needed" tag.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Adequate summary of the article; however some minor improvements can be made such as reducing number of semi-colons for readability.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Sufficient sources for a well-developed article, though there is just one "citation needed" that needs addressing in section 1.1.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    The image of Promethium(III) chloride is Fair use, and remains valid until a free image of the unstable compound can be identified - there are currently no images in the article of promethium metal, or graphics of interstellar promethium that may have been detected via astronomical instruments.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    The next step is to make the article on par with Technetium, a current featured article.