Talk:Prophalangopsis obscura

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles

India

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles

Tibet

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles

Suggestion that this article be merged into Prophalangopsis[edit]

Strongly opposed There are links for Prophalangopsis obscura at Wikidata, a Commons category, a Species page, & articles in four other languages: ceb:Prophalangopsis obscura, nl:Prophalangopsis obscura, sv:Prophalangopsis obscura, & war:Prophalangopsis obscura. Merging this into Prophalangopsis would certainly break all these links. Let's not botch this! Peaceray (talk) 20:12, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is is an clear instance when WP:5P5 should overrule WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA. Peaceray (talk) 20:23, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge on the grounds that species are usually merged to their monotypic genus. Merging doesn't break links to other wikis (that the reason for leaving redirects), and arguments of short text and semi-duplication seem clear; WP:5P5 just as easily supports a merge as anything else; the arguments about other language links apply to most other merge proposals. Klbrain (talk) 09:52, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 10:47, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]