Jump to content

Talk:Protection of Military Remains Act 1986

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A wish list

[edit]

From the comments on the peer review, here are a few thoughts about how to develop this article:

Split the list into a list article

The list will need to be split at some point as the Mod have indicated that there will be more designations so it will keep getting longer

Add material on protection of aircraft

The coverage is biased to ships at the moment

Add discussion in context of other legislation especially Protection of Wrecks Act 1973

There is some factual material that can be quoted, but I'm not aware of any secondary sources discussing overlap. Does anyone have any material?

Add material on criteria for designation

This should be easy - it is in the Hansard source and the 2001 navy news announcement

Add coordinates for all designated wrecks to the table

This is easy for controlled sites as the coordinates are quoted in the designations. For the protected places, it is possible for coordinates to be unknown as wrecks are designated by name and date of sinking.

Create and add maps (one UK waters, one world) showing locations of designated wrecks.

Requires coordinates as above, and map making technology! Any offers gratefully received!

Anybody have any other offers or requests? Viv Hamilton (talk) 07:18, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another question: Given that some of these vessels are in international waters, what exactly is the legal power of the UK government to set laws and how exactly does it go about enforcing the said laws? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.193.240.57 (talk) 03:46, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When the vessel is in international waters, UK legislation is only binding on UK citizens. If the vessel is in the waters of another country, they usually arrange a bilateral agreement with that country. Of course since this legislation only applies to military vessels, these vessels are immune to salvage under the UN convention on the law of the sea (UNCLOS), so the UK government could bring a civil action in the courts of another country where it was known that someone had recovered material from such a vessel - it doesn't need the protection of wrecks act to do so, but I imagine that US courts, for example, would treat designation as evidence that the UK government expected its rights under UNCLOS to be respected. There is quite a lot of discussion about this sort of issue in the JNAPC publication The UNESCO Convention for the Protection of the Underwater Culteral Heritage - Proceedings of the Burlington House Seminar October 2005 ISBN 0-9533950-0-6 /978-0-9533950-0-2 Viv Hamilton (talk) 17:42, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Protection of Military Remains Act 1986. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:34, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Protection of Military Remains Act 1986. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:52, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Protection of Military Remains Act 1986. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:21, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]