Talk:Provincial Assembly of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Provincial Assembly of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in Pakistani English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Pakistan: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Mid‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

PA members and their Party Affiliation

I am just curious about the numbers - they don't match with the official numbers provided by Provincial Assembly of NWFP's website link. (Ketabtoon (talk) 01:18, 5 December 2009 (UTC))[reply]

File:Nwfp46.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Nwfp46.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 18 November 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:14, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NWFP/Khyber Pakhtunhkwa

I really believe very sincerely that there MUST, please, be a uniform system for ref to either 'NWFP' and/or 'Khyber Pakhtunkhwa' througout Wikipedia. Right now, its v confusing. Historically, and legally/constitutionally, the province was the NWFP from 1901 to April 2010-- and I think that in cases wher the earlier history prior to 2010 is refered to, we must write NWFP with possibly (now Khyber Pakhtunkhwa) to follow this. That would really smooth away a lot of public confusion and ensure uniformity in editing. What are your views, please? Khani100 (talk) 16:19, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Khani100[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:31, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please add the reserved seats and final total for the 1970-1997 elections

I couldn't find the information regarding the amount of reserved seats that were alloted to each party during those elections. DrWineBerry (talk) 07:14, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]