Talk:Provisional ballot
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]trying to verify disputed claim (82.35.102.29 14:12, 18 August 2006 (UTC))
Rename?
[edit]Should we rename this article to Provisional ballot in the United States since it currently has a global tag? RJFJR (talk) 20:09, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- I've not actually heard of provisional ballots (or equivalent) being used outside the US. It's certainly possible that I'm ignorant on the issue, but I wouldn't suggest moving the article until that question has been answered. I've tagged the article for needing an expert. Let's see if anyone responds. Electiontechnology (talk) 21:31, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Perhaps you could just add something like "A provisional ballot, often referring to a provisional ballot in the United States, ... "169.235.12.9 (talk) 02:51, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
In the UK there is a similar procedure called a "tendered ballot". However, this is only used for situations where a voter is counted as already having voted, not for voters who are trying to vote without being registered. As such, they are not counted at all under normal circumstances, but are retained as evidence in case the election result is challenged. – Smyth\talk 11:48, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Links broken
[edit]It appears that the links to the 2004 EAC report and the 2006 EAC report are broken. Patphilly (talk) 22:00, 23 November 2012 (UTC).
Voter caging
[edit]"One method used and misused is the practice of voter caging"
I believe this should be removed or amended to indicate it is illegal in the united states and has been since 1965, this seems to indicate it is still a common practice and I would have to believe if it was illegal it would not be.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Provisional ballot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081106224959/http://www.sos.state.mn.us/docs/challenger_faq_2008.pdf to http://www.sos.state.mn.us/docs/challenger_faq_2008.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061108225527/http://nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2006/1103nj1.htm to http://nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2006/1103nj1.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081022184913/http://www.advancementproject.org/pdfs/Provisional-Ballot-Report-Final-9-16-08.pdf to http://www.advancementproject.org/pdfs/Provisional-Ballot-Report-Final-9-16-08.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:51, 24 December 2017 (UTC)