Talk:Psylliodes luridipennis

Psylliodes luridipennis has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 20, 2014. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Psylliodes luridipennis appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 September 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Lundy cabbage flea beetle is found only on the small British island of Lundy, where it feeds on the endemic Lundy cabbage?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Psylliodes luridipennis.

Wikipedia

Insects Mid‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Beetles Mid‑importance

	Insects portal Psylliodes luridipennis is within the scope of WikiProject Beetles, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to beetles. For more information, visit the project page.BeetlesWikipedia:WikiProject BeetlesTemplate:WikiProject Beetlesbeetle articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Psylliodes luridipennis/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: FunkMonk (talk · contribs) 10:17, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll review this. FunkMonk (talk) 10:17, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, I appreciate it. J Milburn (talk) 17:36, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
F. von Kutschera, first name?
- Found it here. Not the most reliable of sources, but I think it's safe to go with (though I'm not citing). J Milburn (talk) 17:36, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"have been aided by 'stepping stone' land to the north east" of the island." Which I assume is now submerged?
- Clarified. J Milburn (talk) 17:36, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Should the binomial be bolded in the lead? A bit more complicated here, since the binomial is the article name...
- I've switched it around. I can debold the common names if you'd prefer. J Milburn (talk) 17:36, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Anything in what its closest relatives are?
- Not that I've found. I don't think its been part of any taxonomic studies. J Milburn (talk) 19:52, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Why a cite in the lead? Should be unnecessary.
- Removed. It was there to preemptively appease the DYK crowd.
Seems a bit weird that the common name is used in the article, while the article title is the binomial. Is this common in recognised insect articles?
- Good point, reworked. 17:36, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
"distinguish it from its ally" Ally in what way? Particularly close relation? Or just a member of the genus that happens to live on Lundy?
- It's a copy-paste from the (PD) source, to be honest (as I note in the footnote). I suspect it's just because they're in the same genus. I can remove it if you think it's problematic. J Milburn (talk) 17:36, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"the species was also willing to feed upon other crucifers taken from gardens." Under what circumstances?
- When researchers are intrigued! I've clarified. J Milburn (talk) 17:36, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"and an undescribed race of flea beetle Psylliodes napi" Is this the short winged form mentioned under description? And shouldn't it be "the flea beetle"?
- Yeah. There's not really any difference between "race" and "form" (like there's no real difference between a "hamlet" and a "village") and the sources use both. I've added "the", though I think either is fine. J Milburn (talk) 17:36, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"and the wind for pollination" Easter egg links are discouraged, not sure how to work around it.
- I've reworked slightly- preferred? J Milburn (talk) 17:36, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"The white[7] Lundy cabbage flea beetle larvae" Maybe just say white larvae here, since earlier you distinguish species by colour in the common names, so I was almost confused here.
- Yep, that's fair. J Milburn (talk) 17:36, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Though the committee notes that "[h]ost plant numbers have been low, but relatively stable since 2001", it notes"Notes twice, a bit repetitive?
- Rephrased. J Milburn (talk) 17:36, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, changes look good, so I'll pass. One final thought, Psylliodes could need an article, but that's of course not part of the task here. FunkMonk (talk) 22:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, I appreciate it. I'll look into an article for the genus. J Milburn (talk) 22:40, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]