Talk:Ptolemy XII Auletes/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MrClog (talk · contribs) 20:30, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Will review the article within 7 days. --MrClog (talk) 20:30, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
First pass
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- I fixed some small spelling mistakes. Per MOS:CONSISTENCY, I made sure the article consistently uses British English.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- Please see comments below.
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Very good!
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Please take a look at the comments below, and ping me if you fixed one or more, so I'll
strikethem. --MrClog (talk) 22:37, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- Please take a look at the comments below, and ping me if you fixed one or more, so I'll
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
[edit](2d) Copyvio: too much close pharaphrasing(?)- It looks like the links listed have copied from Wikipedia. Векочел (talk) 17:26, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- Quite a lot of paraphrasing issues dealt with, but still some way to go. Amitchell125 20:03, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- This appears to be the only instance left to be dealt with. --MrClog (talk) 21:44, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- @MrClog: Seems that the link is copying content from Wikipedia. For instance it uses text from the lede of the Cleopatra article. Векочел (talk) 23:13, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- After doing some research, I indeed did find out that the text was already on Wikipedia before it was on donsmaps.com.
(2b) /Early life/ - Does cite 8 support the claim? "unkown not mentioned on p. 60 "uncertain" not mentioned on p. 60- I believe the fact that his birthdate is uncertain is mentioned on p. 60. See the following link: [1] Векочел (talk) 12:29, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
(2b) /Family/ - Cite 21 does not mention page number. Anyone know which page number- Ive added the page number to the article. Векочел (talk) 12:22, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
(2b) /Restoration and Second Reign (55–51 BC)/ - Cite 38 has no page 388- That seems to be a typo. The correct page is p. 338. Векочел (talk) 12:45, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
(2b) Please make sure the citations use|pp=when there are multiple pages (including ranges), and|p=when there is only one page.
- p./pp. errors corrected. Amitchell125 14:43, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Succesful "good article" nomination
[edit]Now that all concerns above are addressed after the review was put on hold, the article has hereby succesfully passed its GA nomination. Congratulations! --MrClog (talk) 14:33, 19 May 2019 (UTC)