Talk:Pujie

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Can you give a reason why Pujie is part of this project? Colipon+(T) 06:29, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Himself,your brother Kangde Emperor and other Manchu politics and military servers,along of chinese servers un "Reformed Chinese state" under Wangchingwei chinese pro-japanese leader or Mongol servers in Mengjiang mongol pro-japanese state stay in service of one fascists nation how are Japan and for all stay under Axis Powers alliance during WW2 period.

additionally these mentioned states stay between or Yen Block japanese alliance.

if this reason for stay in such site

--R72

What the hell? Can someone translate that answer for me? Colipon+(T) 02:33, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

He himself, his brother the Kangde Emperor and other Manchu politicians and serving military men, along with Chinese supporters of the Reformed Government of China under Wang Chingwei, the Chinese pro-Japanese leader, and the Mongolian supporters [of Japan] in Mengjiang, [were part of] the pro-Japanese [puppet] state. They all were aligned with the Axis Powers og WWII. Also they propped up the yen block and Japan's Greater East Asian Coprosperity Sphere [economic) alliances. Charles Matthews 09:09, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, well that does not really qualify him to be part of a Fascism wikiproject. Colipon+(T) 04:36, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So-called pretender

If someone can trace the recent news of relatives of Puyi, none of them claim to be the successor of the empire. This pretender stuff needs to stop, or you never know whether such false information will cause trouble to them. Especially in Chinese articles about them separately, there's no pretender content about them, so there's no reason to make up these information in English one. - George6VI (talk) 04:32, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The coverage Pujie gets in English-language sources focuses overwhelmingly on his status as Puyi's successor and thus successor to the Qing emperors generally. See his obit in the New York Times. That's all that "pretender" means. Is the problem that you don't like the word? Wikipedia has articles on the former royalty of many countries that use the word this way. Whiff of greatness (talk) 05:52, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pujie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051001070201/http://www.city.chiba.jp/ward/e-inage/history/aisinkakurahuketsu.html to http://www.city.chiba.jp/ward/e-inage/history/aisinkakurahuketsu.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:59, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]