This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Correction and Detention Facilities, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Correction and Detention FacilitiesWikipedia:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesTemplate:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesCorrection and Detention Facilities articles
The article mentions subsisting on 50grams of porridge per day. Given that this is less than 450 calories per day (even if the porridge were 100% fat), that is not physically possible. One spends at least 1000 calories per day at absolute minimum and usually much more than that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.78.129.25 (talk) 12:39, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This quote from a source was a bit out of context and misleading. I checked sources and explained it a bit more in detail. As I understood in some periods the prisoners were indeed given extremely small food rations and had to search for whatever edible plants they could find to survive. And thousands of prisoners died of starvation in this and other camps. -- Gamnamu (talk) 14:03, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Editors should consult WP:NPOV (WP:UNDUE and WP:BALASP, specifically). The longest section on this page is based on Kim Hye-sook, whose claims are unverified and likely will never be, practically speaking. I don't think these sorts of shenanigans would be tolerated on a page about the United States. 184.145.40.162 (talk) 13:44, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]