Talk:Python (Busch Gardens Tampa Bay)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk · contribs) 19:29, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:Pass
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Review[edit]
The general manager of Busch Gardens Tampa, William Thurman, expected the approval for the expansion was anticipated due to the recent success seen at the park in October 1975
seems oddly worded. What is specifically tripping me up isexpected the approval for the expansion was anticipated
- Why is reference 12 titled "Tigers"?
- Why is reference 23 used twice when it can just be used at the end of the sentence
she expressed "feeling a little unsteady on [her] feet but exhilarated."
?
-
- Adog, passing. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 21:45, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- @HickoryOughtShirt?4: thank you for the review! :) Adog (Talk・Cont) 21:46, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Adog, Consider nominating it for DYK. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 21:49, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- @HickoryOughtShirt?4: will do! :D Adog (Talk・Cont) 22:21, 1 September 2020 (UTC)