Talk:QuakeC

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

interpreted language

As far as I know it is NOT interpreted. It needs compilation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.34.156.227 (talk) 18:11, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In need of Citations

This article is in need of citations. I'll get to work on it.

EleFlameMax (talk) 20:18, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Turing-completeness

...I put "No" in the infobox (thinking of the original dialect with no arrays, custom types, dynamic strings etc), but am not completely sure, not having really studied this area much. Leushenko (talk) 16:59, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Porting issues. Really?

The page states:

Most video games at the time had their game logic written in plain C/C++ […] it makes the process of porting the game to another platform (such as GNU/Linux) more costly.

I don’t see how. I agree that this makes modders’ day like hell, but porting? I don’t think so.

GergelyPolonkai (talk) 08:04, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]