This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Quedagh Merchant article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is related to the Children's Museum of Indianapolis. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Children's Museum of IndianapolisWikipedia:GLAM/TCMITemplate:WikiProject Children's Museum of IndianapolisChildren's Museum of Indianapolis-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article lies in the latitude of WikiProject Piracy, a crew of scurvy editors bound to sharpen up all Wikipedia's piracy-related articles. If you want to ship with us and help improve this and other Piracy-related articles, lay aboard the project page and sign on for a berth.PiracyWikipedia:WikiProject PiracyTemplate:WikiProject PiracyPiracy articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
The source mentions the Quedagh Merchant, yet the title of the article is different — Quedah Merchant. Is there a mistake? --Hillock65 (talk) 14:57, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have moved the article to most used spelling.Neonblaktalk - 02:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This article only uses one reference for most of the information included, I think it needs a few more reliable sources (and some kind of ref cleanup to let the reader know what books you are using, not just Zachs)... - Adolphus79 (talk) 15:09, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is, I believe the online articles written upon the ship's discovery are using Zacks as their historical reference as well. It may not be possible to get this to GA, but it's worth getting this as well done as I can before I move on.Neonblaktalk - 15:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Google books found a few that were written before Zacks'... it might be worth checking out, even if just to "spice up" the reflist... If they say the same thing, you might consider replacing a couple of the Zacks inlines with others... IMHO, when I see a reflist like that, I think to myself, "What if that one book was wrong?"... - Adolphus79 (talk) 18:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. I will try more thorough searches. Also, I want to put an info-box in the article, but unsure of which to use. There just isn't enough information for a "Ship", and probably not the right subject for a "Shipwreck". The ship was scuttled, not "wrecked".Neonblaktalk - 21:15, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
