Talk:Queen's Golden Gaels

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment[edit]

I have rated this a Start Class, as I believe many areas need expansion and much of the lead needs to be incorporated into a main body article. I have rated it of low importance, as it is unlikely that many readers are familiar with the topic of the article. Cheers, CP 23:27, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was moved. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:33, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Queen's Gaels → Queen's Golden Gaels — The name has NOT been officially changed, as per multiple media sources -- thus Wikipedia should refer to it by the name that the department itself admits is the official one, Golden Gaels. Kingston's biggest media sources, as per the department's word about what the "official" name is, continue to call them the Golden Gaels. Queen's Gaels should be considered as a nickname that the Athletics Department uses, but which is not the actual name. Tyking (talk) 21:18, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support I agree with Tyking that the Queen's Public Relations department announced this as a marketing plan and it's somewhat clear that they have not changed the name of the team. The Queen's PR department released this marketing plan that would emphasise the word "Gaels" and drop the word "Golden" from uniforms and marks but put more emphasis on the gold colour and plainly stated, "We have not dropped the name 'Golden Gaels'". I believe I may have reverted some early changes to try use that pr release as an excuse to rename the team. However, it has been a year now and I wonder if the PR department's release has made progress in changing public's perception of the name of the team. Not scientific but here's a comparison of Google News search of the last month's articles.
    Queen's Gaels -Golden gives 5 true hits: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
    Queen's "Golden Gaels" gives 10 true hits: [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]
I still say the official and publicly recognised nickname is Golden Gaels but there should be an full explanation in the article that the current promoted label is Gaels. DoubleBlue (talk) 22:11, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think such an explanation does now exist via the "Name" section I wrote. Tyking (talk) 22:00, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I think that does it well. I was just mentioning it here in the context of whether a move was a good idea. I think as long the two versions of the name are explained factually and neutrally it is fine and the Name section is good for that. DoubleBlue (talk) 04:50, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support — Obviously, the Queen of England isn't a corporation (or... maybe she is?), but the parallels to WP:MOSTM are easy enough to draw. We won't move Wal-mart yet, for example. WP:CRYSTAL is really the most appropriate citation against the move right at this moment.
    — V = I * R (talk) 04:50, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Orphaned references in Queen's Golden Gaels[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Queen's Golden Gaels's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "hist":

  • From National Lacrosse League: "Lax 101: League History". NLL.com. Retrieved 27 March 2007.
  • From McMaster Marauders football: "McMaster Football Media Guide" (PDF). McMaster University. 2011.
  • From Queen's University: "General History". Queen's University. Archived from the original on 6 July 2011. Retrieved 26 July 2011.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:16, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Queen's Golden Gaels. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Queen%27s_Golden_Gaels&oldid=1211941159"