Jump to content

Talk:QuikSCAT

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Claims

[edit]

The claim that QuickSCAT the only satellite capable of retrieving ocean winds is patently false. ERS-2 has a wind scatterometer and SAR radars on both ERS and Envisat can detect ocean winds. --—Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.171.5.126 (talkcontribs)

Still, the MSNBC article is pretty specific... "Certain hurricane forecasts could be up to 16 percent less accurate if a key weather satellite that is already beyond its expected lifetime fails, the National Hurricane Center's new director said Friday. ... Proenza told The Associated Press that both two- and three-day forecasts would be affected." Both of the satellites mentioned above are European satellites, might there be some issue with the US agency getting timely updates from European satellites? Or maybe the European satellites don't have the same resolution or coverage of the U.S. that QuickSCAT does? --Interiot 17:03, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The claim that the failure of QuickSCAT could jeopardize hurricane forecasts is also patently false. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 151.205.211.133 (talkcontribs) 17:12, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why? I don't know much about the issue, but losing a useful instrument and having less data can't very well help forecasts. If this claim is false, it is certainly not patently false. Foobaz·o< 22:24, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The ESA ENVISAT satellite doesnt actually carry a scatterometer. the last ESA scat was on ERS-2 Idcamron (talk) 13:48, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on QuikSCAT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:21, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]