Talk:Quint (international coalition)

NATO Start‑class (inactive)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject NATO, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NATOWikipedia:WikiProject NATOTemplate:WikiProject NATONATO articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Hi![edit]

Nice to see that finally there a section here on Wikipedia that talk about the Quint! LuigiPortaro29 (talk)11:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 May 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: the relister's reading of the discussion notwithstanding, it appears that there is consensus to move the page to Quint (international organization) at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 08:17, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NATO Quint → Quint (multilateral relations group) – Per this article, the Quint is not exclusive to NATO, but it also participates in topics related to OECD, the G7 and the G20. Thus, it should be renamed, although I am not sure if this is the best potential name we could get. Super Ψ Dro 20:10, 2 May 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. FOARP (talk) 17:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose but alternative suggestion—I think Quint (international organization) might be better. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If no-one else votes in this discussion, to avoid it from being closed as no consensus, you can count me as another support for this proposal. Super Ψ Dro 19:13, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with you , the mame might better Quint international organization'--LuigiPortaro29 (talk) 22:21, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relist comment - Super Dromaeosaurus: your proposed move is already counted as a !vote for moving. LuigiPortaro29 - it would probably help if you also said what you think of Ceyockey's proposed alternative name. FOARP (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.