Talk:R&R Partners/Archives/2012
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Vandalism
Looks like R&R partners has a PR person blanking pages ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdr81 (talk • contribs) 16:52, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
We have reason to believe the user KDR81 is an employee of the Nevada Policy Research Institute who has made additions and undos to this page to shroud R&R Partners in controversy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adexpertinlv (talk • contribs) 06:18, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- User KDR81 did 2 reverts on the 5th and 1 revert on the 8th. That hardly violates the 3rr rule. Furthermore User Adexpertinlv is probably a sockpuppet of LasVegasNPRI which is probably a sockpuppet of someone else. LasVegasNPRI account made the same exact accusation above on the KDR81 user's page. NOTE that there have been about 5 or 6 single use accounts, meaning accounts that come one here and revert twice then the user switches to a new account.(LVAustrian (talk) 07:27, 9 December 2008 (UTC))
LVAustrian has made multiple contribs to pages associated with the controversy over the last week. Ironically the contribs are in conjunction with contribs by user KDR81. See NPRI, LVCVA, and R&R Partners. KDR81 and LVAustrian are either sockpuppets or meatpuppets acting on behalf of the the NPRI. A game of coordinated contributing by employees of the NPRI are at hand. The contribs are intended to shroud the organizations in controversy above all else.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Adexpertinlv (talk • contribs) 21:55, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
edits
I've put back in criticism of the criticism, hoping the R&R pr department that keeps reverting the information is a little more appeased. I've also requested arbitration so the vandalism and revert waring stops. (LVAustrian (talk) 07:27, 9 December 2008 (UTC))
User KDR81 continues to make additions and edits to the R&R Partners page only related to a single controversy. Is this an attempt at improving Wikipedia, or an attempt at using Wikipedia to forward the agenda of one organization against another? I ask you that wiki fans? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adexpertinlv (talk • contribs) 21:55, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
mediation cabal
Hello I am looking into this matter for the Mediation Cabal. Is there still a dispute? Geoff Plourde (talk) 05:36, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Yes... the User KDR81 and his meatpuppet/sockuppet LVAustriant continue to add content in favor of their employer the NPRI 24.120.32.66 (talk) 19:42, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Well can you prove that they are employed by the NPRI? Geoff Plourde (talk) 07:05, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Sure... Google the user name and read the article comments. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.120.32.66 (talk) 07:30, 19 January 2009 (UTC)