Talk:Römer + Römer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:38, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive poorly sourced info[edit]

I've reverted the 'revision' of 29 November 2018 again. This isn't the subjects' website, but a balanced summary about them in an online encyclopedia. The revision removed a number of reliable secondary news sources (important to proving the subject is widely known or significant). It also added completely excessive and apparently indisciminate lists of (a) exhibitions and (b) further reading (mainly exhibition catalogues). If there are important (solo?) exhibitions which have secondary citations, fair enough, maybe they should be listed, but not every exhibition the artists have ever participated in. If there is independent secondary coverage it should be used/listed, though gallery catalogues are not independent (afetr all, they are promoting an exhibition). I'd urge the new editor to add to what is alrwady in the Wikipedia article, rather than replace it wholesale. Sionk (talk) 23:37, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]