Talk:R-39 Rif

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on R-39 Rif. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:32, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

mention in The Hunt for Red October[edit]

Tom Clancy's The Hunt for Red October repeatedly mentions this missile by its NATO reporting name (sorta) but persists in referring to it as a "Seahawk." Example quote: "The Red October carried twenty-six SS-N-20 Seahawk missiles, each with eight 500-kiloton multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles—MIRVs—enough to destroy two hundred cities." (p. 12) This might be an interesting addition to the article (assuming that it is sufficiently notable) although it would be worth it to seek expert testimony or, better yet, some reliable sources (a book review, perhaps? one written by a naval officer?) that deals with this subject and especially the missile's name (artistic license or just a Clancy goof?). Throwing it out there, might come back to this later. RexSueciae (talk) 20:47, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]