Talk:REV Group

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 May 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Toa Nidhiki05 (Work) (talk · contribs) has been paid by Full Metal Chicken on behalf of REV Group. Their editing has included contributions to this article.

Name Change[edit]

According to the website, Allied Specialty Vehicles has changed its name to REV Group the page for the company should probably be changed too — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Green Arrow1 (talk • contribs) 10:56, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed rework of article[edit]

Hey everyone, I'm here to propose a rework of this article to improve the page, increase the number of reliable sources, and eliminate unsourced information. Full disclosure per WP:PAID: REV Group is a client.

The full rework can be found here: User:Toa Nidhiki05 (Work)/Projects. This is a complete overhaul of the article. I've tried to minimize links to company websites and press releases and to use reliable sources and business magazines. Every claim made in this revised version should be backed by reliable sources. Additionally, REV Group is willing to provide images under Creative Commons license.

Since I'm a connected contributor, I can't make these changes myself as they are too large. However, please feel free to review and let me know of any issues or feedback. I'm happy to adjust and modify the proposal as needed in order to improve this article beyond its current shabby condition. Toa Nidhiki05 (Work) (talk) 17:31, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support I'm thinking that this format adjustment goes a long way towards improving/upgrading the article. Though effectively doubling the size of the page, the new format presents it in an informative layout that improves the ability to both read the article as well as editing it. -SteveCof00 (talk) 05:07, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate the feedback, SteveCof00. Given nobody else has responded in the last few weeks, and I'm not sure how long it will take for more feedback, if you do approve of the change adding any or all of it would be appreciated. Toa Nidhiki05 (Work) (talk) 14:56, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just checking in about this again, SteveCof00 - if the content looks good, adding any or all of it might be a more productive way than waiting for further responses, given it's been two months now without any other feedback. Toa Nidhiki05 (Work) (talk) 15:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Given it has been three months with no comment, I've gone ahead and implemented this proposed change. I'm hoping that, at minimum, this spurs more discussion on the proposal, which has unfortunately stalled with little indication of resuming any time soon. If any part of this edit is objectionable, please revert and explain and I'll be happy to collaborate in any way. Toa Nidhiki05 (Work) (talk) 16:30, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]