Talk:RIGOL Technologies
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Spelling/case
[edit]Shouldn't it be Rigol instead of RIGOL? Why or why not? --Mortense (talk) 14:39, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- I picked "RIGOL" since it looks like that's how they prefer to write it on their website and on their equipment, but I've seen it written "Rigol" as well. I'm honestly not sure which is actually correct. Probably the right way to decide is to look at some official documents (trademark filings perhaps?) and see how it's written there. -- CaptainTickles (talk) 04:18, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class company articles
- Unknown-importance company articles
- Automatically assessed Companies articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Stub-Class China-related articles
- Low-importance China-related articles
- Stub-Class China-related articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- Stub-Class electronic articles
- Low-importance electronic articles
- WikiProject Electronics articles