Jump to content

Talk:RMS Queen Mary/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on RMS Queen Mary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:RMS Queen Mary/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article has been rated B-class under the WikiProject:Los Angeles assessment criteria as it has sufficint and useful information reguarding Los Angeles-related information but a serious student or researcher trying to use the material would have trouble doing so, it is only mid-importance because Long Beach is a seperate city to Los Angeles, but still falls under the scope of the LA County. More information would serve this article well in a peer-review situation if a GA status is to be achieved. After some minor improvements I would be happy to re-evaluate my grading. * Taifarious1 03:54, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Last edited at 03:55, 18 December 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 03:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Edit

What happend to my change and link?????? Arydberg (talk) 05:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

The Hull Is Corroding

Reports have come out that the Queen Mary's hull and other vital components are corroding:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/03/15/queen-maryship-corroded-fixes-could-near-300-million/

Where can we mention this in the article? Thoughts, anyone?TH1980 (talk) 01:59, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Utilizing the above source, I added the following to the section about the ship as a tourist attraction:
"In 2017 a report on the ship's current condition was issued. The report noted that not only the hull but also the supports for a raised exhibition area within the ship were corroding, and that the ship's deteriorating condition left areas such as the engine room vulnerable to flooding. Repairs were estimated at close to $300 million. In November 2016 the City of Long Beach had put $23 million toward addressing the Queen Mary's most vital repairs. John Keisler, economic and property development director for Long Beach, said, "We have a timeline in which the engineers believe they can complete those immediate projects. These are major challenges we can only address over time; it can't all be done at once." Political leaders in Scotland, birthplace of the Queen Mary, have called for UK Prime Minister Theresa May to pressure the American government to fund a full repair of the liner."
How's that?-TH1980 (talk) 00:19, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on RMS Queen Mary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:28, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:RMS_Queen_Mary/Archive_2&oldid=1238176566"