Talk:R v Church of Scientology of Toronto

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the R v Church of Scientology of Toronto article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Scientology Start‑class High‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.ScientologyWikipedia:WikiProject ScientologyTemplate:WikiProject ScientologyScientology articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Canada: Law Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Paired article

There really is a need for an article that covers the chain of events in Ontario from the Operation Snow White actions, through the raid, the various legal and publicity campaigns, Hill v. Scientology, etc, all as Scientology Series article, leaving this one mainly as a CanLaw article that covers the case itself. (I'll get right on it in my spare time...) AndroidCat 03:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page title?

It'd be helpful if someone more knowledgeable than me could explain why the title of the page is "R. v. Church..." Is "R" used as an abbreviation in the Canadian legal system for The Queen? I'm not familiar with the abbreviation. 98.232.51.88 (talk) 17:22, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. -- Cirt (talk) 21:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"religious organization"

Does Canada officially recognize any religion? It doesn't have an official religion, and as far as I can tell religious organizations have no special legal status. - rakslice (talk) 07:53, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on R v Church of Scientology of Toronto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071219080712/http://www.sptimes.com/News/32999/Worldandnation/Abroad__Critics_publi.html to http://www.sptimes.com/News/32999/Worldandnation/Abroad__Critics_publi.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:22, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]