Talk:Rabbit Keen/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 02:38, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


I'll do this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 02:38, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·


Comments[edit]

  • I copyedited the article (easier than writing out all the minor comments) here. Let me know if you disagree with any of the edits.
  • Image is fair use, appropriately tagged and used.
  • and being a member of the relay team in the latter., this wording here is clunky. Maybe just and for the relay team?
  • Dr. Pepper's team in the Capital City League Dr. Pepper as in the drink? Can you link that?
  • The non newspaper references need access-dates.
  • Spot check: 4, 7, 9, 13, 17, 20, 23, 25, 28
    • Ref #4 has a problem with the link. Newspapers.com says it is missing.
    • Keen also holds the record for longest completion in league history by a player who only completed one pass. is a really close paraphrase of the source. Can you reword a bit or just directly quote?

Looks really good. Putting on hold. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 02:55, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • That ref #4 issue is very odd - I went to the page ([1]) and clicked on the clipping, and it said unavailable, and then I made a new clipping myself (see here for my recent clippings), clicked on it, and was told it was unavailable. Maybe including a link like this might work? BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:19, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Gonzo fan2007: I think I've addressed all the issues. As for the newspapers.com issue, I put this as the url which I believe still works for those who aren't subscribed to the website. BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:13, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.