Talk:Racine Dominican Sisters

Catholicism Low‑importance

Racine Dominican Sisters is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Religion Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Link Error?[edit]

Why does a link on the CHI West page, showing The Congregation of the Dominican Sisters of St. Catherine of Siena of Kenosha, Inc. link to the Racine Dominicans entry? The Kenosha Dominicans are/were a separate community from the Racine Dominicans. Is this an error? Tredzwater (talk) 14:43, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tredzwater - I feel your frustration. Every time I try to edit the information, a user undoes it... I'm working on a solution. The page is simply inaccurate. Racinedominicans (talk) 17:26, 9 November 2011 (UTC)racinedominicans[reply]

Every time you edit, you add in a block of text copied verbatim from another website - this is a clear violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies, and and such additions will be removed. Inaccurate or not (and you offer no proof of this), you do not have an exception to the rules. MikeWazowski (talk) 17:46, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mike - I understand how my edits were a violation. But the current posting has no proof of accuracy either and that has not been removed... So something that someone makes up and writes is considered more accurate than information from the source itself? These standards are a little screwy. What's your interest in the Sisters anyway? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.170.251.78 (talk) 12:56, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]